Barry's Model Railroad

Barry's Model Railroad

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label BNSF Railway. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BNSF Railway. Show all posts

Sunday, April 3, 2016

The BNSF Tshirt

BNSF 4449
My new tshirt has 6 different locomotives on it. It shows the heritage of the BNSF railway. There are 2 Santa Fe locomotives road numbers 347C and 5663, along with a Burlington Northern locomotive road number 6481, and finally 3 BNSF locomotives showing the various paint schemes used by the railway road numbers 964, 4449, and 7748. 

Saturday, March 19, 2016

Tomorrow is the Mt Pleasant Train Show




I am so looking forward to the train show in Mt. Pleasant tomorrow. I will be going with my wife Sandy. The hope is that I will be able to find some rolling stock in HO for the following railroads: Union Pacific, Norfolk Southern, and BNSF. I would really like to pick up a Union Pacific caboose. I am so close to completing the grand kids layout I can taste it. Hopefully they will have a couple of 9 inch straight Terminal rerailers in Nichol silver EZtrack. I am also looking for a BNSF Tshirt and cap.

Thursday, March 3, 2016

36th Annual Mid Michigan Model Train Show


On March 20th 2016 at 10AM-3PM at the Finch Fieldhouse on the campus of Central Michigan University in Mount Pleasant Michigan the Saginaw River Valley Model Railroad Club will be presenting the 36th Annual Mid Michigan Model Train Show. I am looking forward to this show because I hope to pick up a few items that I have found hard to find over the past year. The first of which is to find items to help round out the grandkids layout that I have been working on. I hope to find rolling stock with Norfolk Southern, Union Pacific, and BNSF markings. 

This year will be the Last year that Mountain Town Hobbies will be represented as they are going out of business. I am sure I will be able to pick up a lot of good stuff at a very reasonable price at their booth.

Saturday, February 13, 2016

The Grandkids Layout Is Coming Along Just Fine


Work has been halted on The Union Pacific loop but the other 3 loops have been completed and are currently running.

The Norfolk Southern loop still needs some rolling stock which I will be looking for at the Train shows in the area.

The CSX Loop is complete and running smothly.

The BNSF loop could use some more rolling stock which I am also looking tto pick up at the train shows.

Thursday, January 21, 2016

BNSF Railway




From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The BNSF Railway (reporting mark BNSF) is one of the largest freight railroad networks in North America, second to theUnion Pacific Railroad (UP) (its primary competitor for Western U.S. freight), and is one of seven North American Class I railroads. It has 48,000 employees, 32,500 miles (52,300 km) of track in 28 states, and over 8,000 locomotives.[1] It has threetranscontinental routes that provide high-speed links between the western and eastern United States. BNSF trains traveled over 169 million miles in 2010, more than any other North American railroad.[2] The BNSF and UP have a duopoly on all transcontinental freight rail lines in the Western U.S. and shares trackage rights over thousands of miles of track.
According to corporate press releases, the BNSF Railway is among the top transporters of intermodal freight in North America. It also hauls bulk cargo. For instance, the railroad hauls enough coal to generate roughly ten percent of the electricity produced in the United States.
Headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas, the railroad is a wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.[3]
The creation of BNSF started with the formation of a holding company, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation on September 22, 1995. This new holding company then purchased the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (often called the "Santa Fe") and Burlington Northern Railroad, and formally merged the railways into the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway on December 31, 1996. On January 24, 2005, the railroad's name was officially changed to "BNSF Railway," using the initials of its original name.[4]
In 1999, Burlington Northern Santa Fe and the Canadian National Railway announced their intention to merge and form a new corporation entitled North American Railways to be headquartered in Montreal, Canada. The United States' Surface Transportation Board (STB) placed a 15-month moratorium on all rail mergers, which ended this merger.
On November 3, 2009, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway announced it would acquire the remaining 77.4 percent of BNSF it did not already own for $100 per share in cash and stock - a deal valued at $44 billion. The company is investing an estimated $34 billion in BNSF and acquiring $10 billion in debt.[5][6][7][8][9] On February 12, 2010, shareholders of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation voted in favor of the acquisition.[10]

History[edit]

BNSF Dash 9-44CW #1041 leading a manifest freight train northwest of Shallowater, Texas, running on former ATSF railroad tracks that run parallel to U.S. Route 84 as they cross the high plains of the Llano Estacado. Immediately behind the locomotive are cars painted in the old Burlington Northern livery.
BNSF's history dates back to 1849, when the Aurora Branch Railroad in Illinois and the Pacific Railroad of Missouri were formed. The Aurora Branch eventually grew into the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad, (CB&Q), a major component of predecessor Burlington Northern. A portion of the Pacific Railroad became the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway(Frisco).[citation needed]
The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (ATSF) was chartered in 1859. It built one of the first transcontinental railroadsin North America, linking Chicago and Southern California; major branches led to Texas, Denver, and San Francisco. TheInterstate Commerce Commission denied a proposed merger with the Southern Pacific Transportation Company in the 1980s.[citation needed]
The Burlington Northern Railroad (BN) was created in 1970 through the consolidation of the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad, the Great Northern Railway, the Northern Pacific Railway and the Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railway. It absorbed the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway (Frisco) in 1980. Its main lines included Chicago-Seattle with branches to Texas (ex-Burlington) and Montgomery, Alabama (ex-Frisco), and access to the low-sulfur coal of Wyoming's Powder River Basin.[citation needed]

BN-ATSF merger[edit]

On June 30, 1994, BN and ATSF announced plans to merge; they were the largest and smallest (by mileage) of the "Super Seven," the seven largest of the then-twelve U.S. Class I railroads. The long-rumored announcement was delayed by a disagreement over the disposition of Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corporation, a gold mining subsidiary that ATSF agreed to sell to stockholders.[11] This announcement began the next wave of mergers, as the "Super Seven" were merged down to four in the next five years. The Illinois Central Railroad and Kansas City Southern Railway (KCS), two of the five "small" Class Is, announced on July 19 that the former would buy the latter,[12] but this plan was called off on October 25. The Union Pacific Railroad (UP), another major Westernsystem, started a bidding war with BN for control of the SF on October 5.[13] The UP gave up on January 31, 1995, paving the way for the BN-ATSF merger.[14] Subsequently, the UP acquired the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (SP) in 1996, and Eastern systems CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern Railway split Conrail in 1998.[citation needed]
On February 7, 1995, BN and ATSF heads Gerald Grinstein and Robert D. Krebs both announced shareholders had approved the plan, which would save overhead costs and combine BN's coal and ATSF's intermodal strengths. Although the two systems complemented each other with little overlap,[15] in contrast to the Santa Fe-Southern Pacific merger, which failed because it would have eliminated competition in many areas of the Southwest, BN and ATSF came to agreements with most other Class Is to keep them from opposing the merger. UP was satisfied with a single segment of trackage rights from Abilene, Kansas to Superior, Nebraska, which BN and ATSF had both served. KCS gained haulage rights to several Midwest locations, including Omaha, East St. Louis, and Memphis, in exchange for BNSF getting similar access to New Orleans. SP, initially requesting far-reaching trackage rights throughout the West,[16] soon agreed on a reduced plan, whereby SP acquired trackage rights on ATSF for intermodal and automotivetraffic to Chicago, and other trackage rights on ATSF in Kansas, south to Texas, and between Colorado and Texas. In exchange, SP assigned BNSF trackage rights over the former Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad between El Paso and Topeka and haulage rights to the Mexican border at Eagle Pass, Texas.[17] Regional Toledo, Peoria and Western Railway also obtained trackage rights over BN from Peoria to Galesburg, Illinois, a BN hub where it could interchange with SP[18] (which had rights on BN dating from 1990[19]). The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) approved the BNSF merger on July 20, 1995 (with final approval on August 23), less than a month before UP announced on August 3 that it would acquire SP.[20] Parents Burlington Northern Inc. and Santa Fe Pacific Corporation were acquired on September 22, 1995 by the new Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation. The merger of the operating companies was held up by issues with unions;[21] ATSF merged on December 31, 1996 into BN, which was renamed the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company.[22] Thus the present BNSF Railway Company (name adopted January 24, 2005) dates back to the January 13, 1961incorporation in Delaware[23] of BN as "Great Northern Pacific & Burlington Lines, Inc."[24]
BNSF Railway
BNSF logo.svg
BNSF Railway system map.svg
System map (trackage rights in purple)
BNSF Eastbound Williams Junction, Arizona (15490239760).jpg
BNSF C44-9W #5498 leads a container train on theSouthern Transcon near Williams, Arizona
Reporting markBNSF
LocaleMidwest and Western United States
Dates of operation1996–Present
Predecessor
Track gauge4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm)
Length32,500 miles (52,300 km)
HeadquartersFort Worth, Texas
Websitewww.bnsf.com

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

The Grandkids Layout Update



I am 4 Packs of 26inch radius track away from completing the layout for the grandkids 1 pack completes 1/4 circle. 4 packs will give me a complete circle.
This last circle will complete the 3 loops that make up the entire layout for the grandkids.
the inner loop I will run the BNSF freight train.
The middle loop I am running the CSX freight train
and the outer loop I will run the Norfolk Southern freight train.
The 2 inner loops are all set and running now. The last loop is just about there.

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Buffett's BNSF Open to Bid for Norfolk Southern to Challenge CP's Offer


The railroad controlled by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. vowed to join any consolidation in the North American industry, saying that Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd.’s $27 billion bid for a U.S. rival inevitably would trigger more deals.
BNSF Railway Executive Chairman Matt Rose is open to making a competing offer for Norfolk Southern Corp., the company targeted by Canadian Pacific, and CSX Corp. also would be “very much in play.” While BNSF doesn’t favor fresh dealmaking, the carrier won’t be sidelined if any occurs, Rose said Thursday in a telephone interview.
“We’ve never in this industry just done one merger,” said Rose, 56, who moved into his current post in 2014 after serving as chief executive officer since 2002. “You do a merger and then somebody else announces it because of this issue of stabilization of the industry and parity in various markets.”
BNSF’s willingness to pursue a tie-up underscores the potential challenge for the U.S. Surface Transportation Board, which would have to evaluate any deal. There have been no major U.S. rail mergers for more than 15 years, and the STB has new, untested rules requiring that it evaluate possible follow-on combinations as part of its regulatory review.

Share Rally

CSX and Norfolk Southern both were bright spots for the U.S. stock market Friday, when major indexes slumped. CSX rose 4.1 percent, the most in three months, to $25.72 at the close in New York while Norfolk Southern gained 2 percent to $89.44.
Norfolk Southern has snubbed Canadian Pacific, which wants to create a cross-border, coast-to-coast carrier in a North American industry dominated by six railroads: Norfolk Southern and CSX compete east of the Mississippi; Calgary-based Canadian Pacific vies with Canadian National Railway Co.; and BNSF goes head to head with Union Pacific Corp. in the western U.S.
Tony Hatch, a former Wall Street analyst who tracked many of the 1990s mergers that created the modern industry, said Rose’s comments were intended to slow down any rush to a round of deals that would shrink the industry’s ranks.
“We’re at this stage where everybody is saying, ‘Look if this happens it’s going to be kind of a big thing and not necessarily a good thing,’ ” said Hatch, who now runs ABH Consulting. “Matt’s move is a warning in order to prevent that.”

Union Pacific

Spokesmen for Norfolk Southern, Canadian Pacific and CSX declined to comment on Rose’s remarks, while Union Pacific’s Aaron Hunt said, “We oppose rail industry mergers in the current environment and believe the regulatory hurdles for future consolidation would be significant.”
Putting Canadian Pacific together with Norfolk Southern would leave Jacksonville, Florida-based CSX at a disadvantage, inevitably making that railroad a target as well, Rose said. Canadian Pacific sees $1.8 billion in merger benefits from a Norfolk Southern deal, which “quite frankly creates an uneven, unstable railroad network with CSX,” he said.
“Then you’ve got two railroads in the west that would be looking at, ‘Should one of us jump in with the NS assets or should the other one jump in on the CSX assets?’ ” Rose said.
A BNSF offer for Norfolk, Virginia-based Norfolk Southern would be akin to Union Pacific’s efforts to step in during the 1990s to “provide a competitive bid when the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe were merging,” Rose said. “If there is consolidation to be had, we would participate as well.”
Buffett completed his purchase of Fort Worth, Texas-based BNSF in 2010, a transaction valued at about $34 billion that he described as a bet on the U.S. economy because of railroads’ vital role in moving freight. BNSF could bring considerable resources to bear in future consolidation. Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire had more than $66 billion in cash at the end of the third quarter.
While there haven’t been any combinations among major North American carriers in the 21st century, BNSF does “scenario planning every year,” Rose said.
Rose said shippers don’t support large deals. They are concerned about having fewer options and the railroads having too much market power, he said.
“I just don’t get a sense that the marketplace wants to see a final consolidation,” Rose said. “The marketplace would tell you that they’re already concerned that there’s too much consolidation.”

Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Completing The Norfolk Southern Loop


Hanukkah is coming up in 5 days and rumor has it that I will be getting a Norfolk Southern GE ES44AC locomotive to complete the last loop of the grand kids layout. I thought this would end up out of my reach but Hanukkah Harry must have read my letters and posts on the internet. The only other thing I still need to complete this effort is the track which I can pick up slowly using my bottle and can return money.
The three loops will represent the trans contental freight train picture as it exists in the United States today.
BNSF Railway
BNSF logo.svg
BNSF Railway system map.svg
System map (trackage rights in purple)
BNSF Eastbound Williams Junction, Arizona (15490239760).jpg
BNSF C44-9W #5498 leads a container train on theSouthern Transcon near Williams, Arizona
Reporting markBNSF
LocaleMidwest and Western United States
Dates of operation1996–Present
Predecessor
Track gauge4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm)
Length32,500 miles (52,300 km)
HeadquartersFort Worth, Texas
Websitewww.bnsf.com
CSX Transportation
CSX transp logo.svg
CSX Transportation system map.svg
CSX system map; trackage rights in purple
CSXJAX15.JPG
CSX headquarters building in Jacksonville, Florida
Reporting markCSXT
LocaleAlabama
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Mississippi
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Ontario
Pennsylvania
Quebec
South Carolina
Tennessee
Virginia
Washington D.C.
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Dates of operationJuly 1, 1986; 29 years ago–present
PredecessorChessie System
Clinchfield Railroad
Seaboard System Railroad
Conrail
Baltimore & Ohio
Chesapeake & Ohio
Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Monon Railroad
Track gauge4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm)standard gauge
Length21,000 mi (34,000 km)
HeadquartersJacksonville, Florida
Websitecsx.com
Norfolk Southern Railway
Nsheadlogo.svg
Norfolk Southern Railway system map.svg
NS system map; trackage rights in purple
Reporting markNS
LocaleEastern United States
Dates of operation1894–Present (founded as theSouthern Railway)
Predecessor
Track gauge4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
Length21,500 miles (34,600 kilometres)
HeadquartersNorfolk, Virginia
Websitenscorp.com

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Eyes on BNSF for Merger's

Western Railroad Discussion > Eyes on BNSF for Merger's.


Date: 11/18/05 15:56
Eyes on BNSF for Merger's.
Author: Nbetween


Press reports suggest BNSF Railway, awash in cash, may be considering new merger opportunities that would give it significantly increased market power and a truly North American presence in Mexico, the U.S. and Canada.
An international rail consultant was quoted Nov. 16 by the Canadian Press saying that BNSF may again attempt a merger with Canadian National Railway, which also controls the former Illinois Central, Grand Trunk Western and regional railroad Wisconsin Central.

An article in a transportation law publication in November speculates BNSF may make a grab for Kansas City Southern, which also controls the Tex-Mex and Mexico's TFM railroad.

Rail mergers have been devastating to rail employment. As the number of Class I railroads declined from 39 in 1980 to 7 today (due mostly to consolidations), the number of Class I railroad employees has declined from 458,000 in 1980 to under 155,000 today.

Those who follow mergers have their eyes on BNSF.

Wall Street analysts report that BNSF will have some $2 billion in so-called "free cash" to spend over the next 26 months. That cash could be spent increasing the dividend paid investors, buying back its own stock (which reduces shares available and lifts the stock price), or on acquisitions.

BNSF is North America's second-largest railroad (to Union Pacific), operating some 32,000 miles of railroad and collecting some $10 billion annually in freight revenue. (UP operates slightly more mileage than BNSF, but earns some $12 billion in freight revenue annually. A BNSF combination with KCS or CN could propel BNSF ahead of UP.)

According to international railroad consultant Charles Banks, CEO of R.L. Banks and Associates of Washington, D.C., the most logical partner for CN would be BNSF. (In 2000, BNSF and CN voluntarily canceled merger plans after U.S. regulators imposed a 15-month freeze on railroad consolidations while new rules were written.)

Meanwhile, a publication of the Association of Transportation Law Professionals (the bar association of the U.S. Surface Transportation Board), carried an article suggesting BNSF may have interest in acquiring KCS.

Some analysts think a BNSF/KCS combination is much more likely than a renewal of the BNSF/CN consolidation.

The reason could be KCS' Meridian Speedway, KCS' control of the Tex-Mex, and KCS' subsidiary TFM, a major Mexican railroad running from Laredo, Texas, to Mexico City and serving key Mexican ports at Monterey (east coast of Mexico) and Lazaro Cardenas (west coast of Mexico).

The KCS Meridian Speedway -- linking Meridian, Miss., with Dallas -- is the fastest growing and least congested rail route in America.

KCS' Tex-Mex subsidiary links Houston to the busiest U.S.-Mexico border crossing at Laredo.

BNSF is said to be especially interested in rail access -- through KCS and TFM -- to the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas, on the southwest coast of Mexico.

TFM controls all tracks into and out of the Port of Lazaro Cardenas, and is spending $12 million to improve its rail-monopoly access.

The Port of Lazaro Cardenas is 600 rail miles closer to Houston than the severely congested mega-ports of Long Beach/Los Angeles; Lazaro Cardenas is only 200 miles further from Chicago than Long Beach/Los Angeles; and the Port of Lazaro Cardenas is the closest to Mexico City, whose population is some 22 million.

Labor costs are said to be 30 percent cheaper at the Port of Lazaro Cardenas than U.S. ports, which has attracted the interest of retail giants such as Wal-Mart. It is reported that Wal-Mart is working with ocean carrier Maersk to invest in additional port capacity at Lazaro Cardenas, and terminal operator Hutchison Wampoa already is in the process of increasing the port's capacity 10-fold.

Meanwhile, the Wall Street firm of UBS projects TFM rail-freight revenue associated with port traffic will grow from $29 million to as much as $225 million by 2025 because of Lazaro Cardenas port expansion and increased Asian imports.

UBS projects the Port of Lazaro Cardenas will be handling some two million containers by 2025, which compares to nine million now at Long Beach/Los Angeles and under two million now at the ports of Oakland, Calif., and Seattle.

All mergers involving U.S. railroads must be approved by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board, which, with very few exceptions, has approved most rail mergers presented to it, notwithstanding substantial opposition by shippers and rail labor.

For example, over the past two decades, Union Pacific gained approval to acquire the former Western Pacific, the Missouri Pacific, the Chicago & North Western, and the Southern Pacific.

BNSF, meanwhile, is the combination of the former Burlington Northern and the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe.

Among the very few rail mergers rejected by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board was the 1984 proposed merger of the Santa Fe with the Southern Pacific. And, as mentioned, BNSF and Canadian National voluntarily canceled their merger attempt in 2000.